<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1027 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s receipt for operating and maintaining power plants was not taxable as maintenance or repair services but rather constituted a manufacturing activity due to the generation of electricity. The Tribunal rejected the argument for separate taxation under different services and found no tax liability on maintenance and repair charges. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1027 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s receipt for operating and maintaining power plants was not taxable as maintenance or repair services but rather constituted a manufacturing activity due to the generation of electricity. The Tribunal rejected the argument for separate taxation under different services and found no tax liability on maintenance and repair charges. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>