<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1023 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed Appeal No. E/2001/2012 by reducing fines and penalties, allowed Appeal No. E/2002/2012, and dismissed Appeal No. E/51004/2015. The duty demand on unaccounted production and clearance of SS billets and flats was upheld, with reliance on private records considered credible. The burden was on the appellants to disprove excess production, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to lack of contrary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:10:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1023 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed Appeal No. E/2001/2012 by reducing fines and penalties, allowed Appeal No. E/2002/2012, and dismissed Appeal No. E/51004/2015. The duty demand on unaccounted production and clearance of SS billets and flats was upheld, with reliance on private records considered credible. The burden was on the appellants to disprove excess production, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to lack of contrary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>