<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1019 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355598</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the ineligibility of cenvat credit on cement used for the foundation but allowed the credit on other items based on the Chartered Engineer certificate and supporting legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of properly considering evidence like the certificate and following established legal principles in determining cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1019 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355598</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the ineligibility of cenvat credit on cement used for the foundation but allowed the credit on other items based on the Chartered Engineer certificate and supporting legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of properly considering evidence like the certificate and following established legal principles in determining cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>