<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1018 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order seeking denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant for alleged wrongful availing based on invoices without actual receipt of goods. Lack of substantial evidence beyond third-party statements and the absence of cross-examination opportunities for transporters&#039; statements led to the decision. The Department failed to prove the appellant&#039;s wrongful credit availing, resulting in the Tribunal allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:10:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1018 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order seeking denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant for alleged wrongful availing based on invoices without actual receipt of goods. Lack of substantial evidence beyond third-party statements and the absence of cross-examination opportunities for transporters&#039; statements led to the decision. The Department failed to prove the appellant&#039;s wrongful credit availing, resulting in the Tribunal allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>