https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355586 The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration after M/s. Bhima SSK Ltd.'s refund claim of cenvat credit for bagasse was rejected on grounds of unjust enrichment. The appellant was directed to provide evidence supporting their claim, which was not submitted earlier. The judgment stressed the need to present all relevant evidence at the appropriate stages for a fair consideration of refund claims, particularly concerning issues like unjust enrichment. en-us Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:09:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355586 The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration after M/s. Bhima SSK Ltd.'s refund claim of cenvat credit for bagasse was rejected on grounds of unjust enrichment. The appellant was directed to provide evidence supporting their claim, which was not submitted earlier. The judgment stressed the need to present all relevant evidence at the appropriate stages for a fair consideration of refund claims, particularly concerning issues like unjust enrichment. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355586