https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355579 Rectification under section 35C(2) was held maintainable where the record showed an apparent mistake in the earlier order stating that there was no dispute on clauses (ii) and (iii) of condition No. 3 of Notification No. 23/2003-CE. Since those clauses had been raised in the show cause notice and adjudication proceedings, the order was modified to direct examination of that dispute in appeal E/18/2008. No error was shown in relation to the other appeals, so the remaining rectification requests were rejected. en-us Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:09:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355579 Rectification under section 35C(2) was held maintainable where the record showed an apparent mistake in the earlier order stating that there was no dispute on clauses (ii) and (iii) of condition No. 3 of Notification No. 23/2003-CE. Since those clauses had been raised in the show cause notice and adjudication proceedings, the order was modified to direct examination of that dispute in appeal E/18/2008. No error was shown in relation to the other appeals, so the remaining rectification requests were rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355579