<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 999 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on Real Estate Service and Commercial Construction Service. It found that the disputed transactions were properly recorded and had been reviewed in a previous audit, rendering the show cause notices invoking extended limitation periods invalid. The impugned orders were set aside, granting the appellant consequential benefits in both instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:09:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 999 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on Real Estate Service and Commercial Construction Service. It found that the disputed transactions were properly recorded and had been reviewed in a previous audit, rendering the show cause notices invoking extended limitation periods invalid. The impugned orders were set aside, granting the appellant consequential benefits in both instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>