<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 997 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355576</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing verification of excess amount collection by the appellant from buyers. If no excess amount was found, refund with interest was to be granted within two months, emphasizing the need for accurate verification in refund cases to avoid unjust enrichment assumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 997 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355576</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing verification of excess amount collection by the appellant from buyers. If no excess amount was found, refund with interest was to be granted within two months, emphasizing the need for accurate verification in refund cases to avoid unjust enrichment assumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>