<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 995 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355574</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Department&#039;s confirmation of differential duty, interest liability, and penalty against cement manufacturers for selling cement in 50 kgs. bags to industrial/institutional consumers at concessional rates. Citing past decisions favoring the appellants and the absence of a stay from the Supreme Court against the relevant decision, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing adherence to established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 995 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355574</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Department&#039;s confirmation of differential duty, interest liability, and penalty against cement manufacturers for selling cement in 50 kgs. bags to industrial/institutional consumers at concessional rates. Citing past decisions favoring the appellants and the absence of a stay from the Supreme Court against the relevant decision, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing adherence to established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>