<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 991 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355570</link>
    <description>Input tax credit reversal based on alleged manufacturing loss and non-filing of stock transfer particulars was discussed in the context of an enforcement inspection, with the Court stressing that manufacturing loss must be determined on a scientific basis and after a realistic inspection of the dealer&#039;s factory and process. Although the assessee had not acted diligently, the Court considered that one further opportunity could be granted to avoid prejudice. The assessment orders were not quashed outright; instead, the assessee was permitted to treat them as show-cause notices, file objections, and obtain a personal hearing after payment of 15% of the disputed tax for each assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:08:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 991 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355570</link>
      <description>Input tax credit reversal based on alleged manufacturing loss and non-filing of stock transfer particulars was discussed in the context of an enforcement inspection, with the Court stressing that manufacturing loss must be determined on a scientific basis and after a realistic inspection of the dealer&#039;s factory and process. Although the assessee had not acted diligently, the Court considered that one further opportunity could be granted to avoid prejudice. The assessment orders were not quashed outright; instead, the assessee was permitted to treat them as show-cause notices, file objections, and obtain a personal hearing after payment of 15% of the disputed tax for each assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>