<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 988 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355567</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the assessment order for the years 2014-15 under the TNVAT Act, and remanded the matter to the respondent for a fresh assessment. The respondent was directed to schedule a personal hearing with the petitioner, specify necessary documents, review submissions, and conduct the assessment in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed following the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:08:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 988 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355567</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the assessment order for the years 2014-15 under the TNVAT Act, and remanded the matter to the respondent for a fresh assessment. The respondent was directed to schedule a personal hearing with the petitioner, specify necessary documents, review submissions, and conduct the assessment in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed following the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>