<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1636 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the &#039;NESCLAC Nutritious Milk Drink&#039; should be classified under Tariff Item 0404 90 00. The addition of a small quantity of artificial flavoring substance did not alter the essential nature of the product covered under Heading 0404, and it remained a product consisting of natural milk constituents. The Tribunal referenced previous cases to support this classification, emphasizing that minor additives do not change the fundamental characteristics of milk products. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the differential Central Excise duty demand and penalty were annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1636 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the &#039;NESCLAC Nutritious Milk Drink&#039; should be classified under Tariff Item 0404 90 00. The addition of a small quantity of artificial flavoring substance did not alter the essential nature of the product covered under Heading 0404, and it remained a product consisting of natural milk constituents. The Tribunal referenced previous cases to support this classification, emphasizing that minor additives do not change the fundamental characteristics of milk products. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the differential Central Excise duty demand and penalty were annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>