<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1637 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198987</link>
    <description>The High Court found the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose a Rs. 15 Crores deposit condition for the assessment year 2011-2012 unjustified, as the petitioner was not at fault for the delayed conclusion of the appeals and circumstances remained unchanged. The Court stayed the imposition of this condition, providing relief to the petitioner regarding the financial obligation set by the ITAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1637 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198987</link>
      <description>The High Court found the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose a Rs. 15 Crores deposit condition for the assessment year 2011-2012 unjustified, as the petitioner was not at fault for the delayed conclusion of the appeals and circumstances remained unchanged. The Court stayed the imposition of this condition, providing relief to the petitioner regarding the financial obligation set by the ITAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>