<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1624 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198990</link>
    <description>Denial of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and the applicability of section 80P(4) to an assessee society had to be reconsidered in light of the governing Supreme Court decision. The HC set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment in accordance with that law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1624 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198990</link>
      <description>Denial of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and the applicability of section 80P(4) to an assessee society had to be reconsidered in light of the governing Supreme Court decision. The HC set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment in accordance with that law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>