https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198979 The court held that a writ petition seeking interest on delayed excise duty refunds under Article 226 was not maintainable, citing a Supreme Court decision that clarified the lack of statutory right for such claims before a specific legislative amendment. The court distinguished cases where interest was awarded as consequential relief and dismissed the petition, emphasizing that interest claims alone were not sustainable under Article 226. The petitioner's arguments based on equity and general law were not accepted, and the court ordered the refund of any security deposited without awarding costs. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:47:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198979 The court held that a writ petition seeking interest on delayed excise duty refunds under Article 226 was not maintainable, citing a Supreme Court decision that clarified the lack of statutory right for such claims before a specific legislative amendment. The court distinguished cases where interest was awarded as consequential relief and dismissed the petition, emphasizing that interest claims alone were not sustainable under Article 226. The petitioner's arguments based on equity and general law were not accepted, and the court ordered the refund of any security deposited without awarding costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198979