https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198970 In a special land acquisition valuation regime, the Tribunal's use of the belting method for an urban locality was treated as proper, and its separate allowance for general appreciation and scheme-related special amenities was not found to be an error of principle. Comparable awards and agreed valuations, including Ext. 42, were accepted as relevant evidence of market value, especially where adjacent land materials supported the estimate. In restricted appellate review, interference was confined to error of principle, material evidentiary omission, or substantial procedural defect; absent such infirmity, the Tribunal's factual valuation was not to be disturbed. en-us Tue, 27 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:23:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198970 In a special land acquisition valuation regime, the Tribunal's use of the belting method for an urban locality was treated as proper, and its separate allowance for general appreciation and scheme-related special amenities was not found to be an error of principle. Comparable awards and agreed valuations, including Ext. 42, were accepted as relevant evidence of market value, especially where adjacent land materials supported the estimate. In restricted appellate review, interference was confined to error of principle, material evidentiary omission, or substantial procedural defect; absent such infirmity, the Tribunal's factual valuation was not to be disturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198970