https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198966 The Division Bench allowed the State's appeal, directing the Government to consider promoting diploma-holders based on meritorious service. Subsequently, the Government amended the rules to include exceptionally meritorious diploma-holders for promotion, with retrospective effect from a specified date. The Supreme Court found the review petition challenging the earlier judgment not maintainable due to subsequent events, holding that the review was futile as the judgment had been acted upon and exhausted. The Court clarified that while a fresh challenge could be made under Article 226, the review petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:32:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198966 The Division Bench allowed the State's appeal, directing the Government to consider promoting diploma-holders based on meritorious service. Subsequently, the Government amended the rules to include exceptionally meritorious diploma-holders for promotion, with retrospective effect from a specified date. The Supreme Court found the review petition challenging the earlier judgment not maintainable due to subsequent events, holding that the review was futile as the judgment had been acted upon and exhausted. The Court clarified that while a fresh challenge could be made under Article 226, the review petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198966