https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198958 The court clarified that the adjudicating authority under Section 8 of the PML Act is not responsible for determining guilt but establishing a prima facie conclusion of money laundering. It emphasized that guilt determination falls under the court handling prosecution. The court acknowledged the petitioner's right to appeal under Section 26 of the PML Act. Findings by the Adjudicating Authority do not bind subsequent trials, ensuring independent decisions by trial courts. The judgment upholds due process, fairness, and separation of powers within the legal framework of the PML Act. en-us Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:46:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198958 The court clarified that the adjudicating authority under Section 8 of the PML Act is not responsible for determining guilt but establishing a prima facie conclusion of money laundering. It emphasized that guilt determination falls under the court handling prosecution. The court acknowledged the petitioner's right to appeal under Section 26 of the PML Act. Findings by the Adjudicating Authority do not bind subsequent trials, ensuring independent decisions by trial courts. The judgment upholds due process, fairness, and separation of powers within the legal framework of the PML Act. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198958