<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1417 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198959</link>
    <description>NDMC stated that it was agreeable to adjust the earnest money deposit against dues towards parking media, as reflected in the petitioner&#039;s letter dated 11.05.2016. In view of that statement, the petitioner did not press the writ petition further, and the petition was disposed of. The operative effect was confined to the parties&#039; agreed adjustment of the deposit against outstanding liabilities, with no adjudication on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1417 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198959</link>
      <description>NDMC stated that it was agreeable to adjust the earnest money deposit against dues towards parking media, as reflected in the petitioner&#039;s letter dated 11.05.2016. In view of that statement, the petitioner did not press the writ petition further, and the petition was disposed of. The operative effect was confined to the parties&#039; agreed adjustment of the deposit against outstanding liabilities, with no adjudication on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>