<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 56 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11898</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming that the old shares were valued at cost and not market price, aligning with the principles established in the K.A. Patch case. The judgment highlighted the correct valuation method and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the application of relevant legal precedents in determining tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 56 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11898</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming that the old shares were valued at cost and not market price, aligning with the principles established in the K.A. Patch case. The judgment highlighted the correct valuation method and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the application of relevant legal precedents in determining tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>