<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 961 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355540</link>
    <description>The Members of CESTAT Chandigarh recorded a difference of opinion on whether the imported goods should be released on provisional terms or whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication. The dispute was not finally decided by the Bench and was directed to be placed before the President for nomination of a third Member to resolve the point of difference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:23:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 961 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355540</link>
      <description>The Members of CESTAT Chandigarh recorded a difference of opinion on whether the imported goods should be released on provisional terms or whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication. The dispute was not finally decided by the Bench and was directed to be placed before the President for nomination of a third Member to resolve the point of difference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>