https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355533 The Tribunal upheld the order demanding a differential duty and imposing a redemption fine and penalty on the appellant for mis-declaration of imported goods. The appellant's challenge to the classification of goods as re-rollable material was rejected as they did not dispute it during examination. The Tribunal found the appellant admitted to mis-declaration, leading to the affirmation of the redemption fine and penalty. The appeal was dismissed based on the acknowledgment of mis-declaration and the lack of grounds to overturn the classification and penalties. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 17:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355533 The Tribunal upheld the order demanding a differential duty and imposing a redemption fine and penalty on the appellant for mis-declaration of imported goods. The appellant's challenge to the classification of goods as re-rollable material was rejected as they did not dispute it during examination. The Tribunal found the appellant admitted to mis-declaration, leading to the affirmation of the redemption fine and penalty. The appeal was dismissed based on the acknowledgment of mis-declaration and the lack of grounds to overturn the classification and penalties. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355533