<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 940 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of cenvat credit on commission agent services, citing High Court precedent. The penalty was set aside pending High Court decision. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding ineligible cenvat credit for trading activity, remitting the matter for verification of credit reversal. The appellant was directed to provide evidence for consideration, and further evidence was permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 940 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of cenvat credit on commission agent services, citing High Court precedent. The penalty was set aside pending High Court decision. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding ineligible cenvat credit for trading activity, remitting the matter for verification of credit reversal. The appellant was directed to provide evidence for consideration, and further evidence was permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>