<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355518</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the services provided by the appellants were primarily transportation services, with loading and unloading activities considered ancillary. As a result, the services were not classified under Cargo Handling Services, and no service tax was levied under this category. The appeals were allowed, and the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355518</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the services provided by the appellants were primarily transportation services, with loading and unloading activities considered ancillary. As a result, the services were not classified under Cargo Handling Services, and no service tax was levied under this category. The appeals were allowed, and the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>