<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 917 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355496</link>
    <description>Where a job worker retains scrap and the contract shows reduced job charges because of that retention, the scrap value forms part of the conversion element and is includible in assessable value; the Tribunal rejected the attempt to distinguish pre- and post-2000 valuation rules because the assessable value was still depressed by the scrap benefit. A limitation plea based on bona fide belief also failed, as the favourable order relied on related a different group company with a separate registration and did not justify protection for the appellant. The demand and penalties were therefore sustained against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 917 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355496</link>
      <description>Where a job worker retains scrap and the contract shows reduced job charges because of that retention, the scrap value forms part of the conversion element and is includible in assessable value; the Tribunal rejected the attempt to distinguish pre- and post-2000 valuation rules because the assessable value was still depressed by the scrap benefit. A limitation plea based on bona fide belief also failed, as the favourable order relied on related a different group company with a separate registration and did not justify protection for the appellant. The demand and penalties were therefore sustained against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>