https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355489 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s rejection of the appellant's appeal. Relying on legal precedent established by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that interest is not chargeable on the paid differential duty before finalization of assessment. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing Tablet PCs, Battery Packs, and Solar Chargers, had obtained a Purchase Order from the Ministry of Rural Development, leading to a revision in indicative unit prices and subsequent payment of differential duty. The Tribunal's decision provided relief to the appellant in accordance with the legal principles cited during the proceedings. en-us Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355489 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s rejection of the appellant's appeal. Relying on legal precedent established by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that interest is not chargeable on the paid differential duty before finalization of assessment. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing Tablet PCs, Battery Packs, and Solar Chargers, had obtained a Purchase Order from the Ministry of Rural Development, leading to a revision in indicative unit prices and subsequent payment of differential duty. The Tribunal's decision provided relief to the appellant in accordance with the legal principles cited during the proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355489