<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 909 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the freight element, shown separately in the invoices and collected from the client, was not to be included in the transaction value for Central Excise duty assessment. The Tribunal emphasized that the sale was effectively completed at the factory gate, and the freight arrangement did not make the buyer&#039;s premises the place of removal. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s claim for recovery of differential Central Excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 909 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the freight element, shown separately in the invoices and collected from the client, was not to be included in the transaction value for Central Excise duty assessment. The Tribunal emphasized that the sale was effectively completed at the factory gate, and the freight arrangement did not make the buyer&#039;s premises the place of removal. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s claim for recovery of differential Central Excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>