<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 902 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by M/s. Rhodia Specialty Chemicals India Ltd. regarding the denial of cenvat credit on insurance for directors and supervisory officers post 1.4.2012. The credit for insurance for directors and supervisory officers liability was deemed admissible, rectifying a clerical error in the impugned order. However, the appeal concerning the denial of cenvat credit on marine insurance policy was dismissed due to insufficient arguments establishing the nexus between input services and final product manufacture. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of presenting substantive arguments in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:19:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 902 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by M/s. Rhodia Specialty Chemicals India Ltd. regarding the denial of cenvat credit on insurance for directors and supervisory officers post 1.4.2012. The credit for insurance for directors and supervisory officers liability was deemed admissible, rectifying a clerical error in the impugned order. However, the appeal concerning the denial of cenvat credit on marine insurance policy was dismissed due to insufficient arguments establishing the nexus between input services and final product manufacture. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of presenting substantive arguments in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>