https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355480 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them the refund of the pre-deposit amount. The appellant had complied with the order by depositing interest and 25% penalty within the specified timeframe, despite the deposit being under the wrong accounting head. The Tribunal held that this compliance fulfilled the requirements for penalty reduction, overturning the lower authority's decision to impose a 100% penalty. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355480 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them the refund of the pre-deposit amount. The appellant had complied with the order by depositing interest and 25% penalty within the specified timeframe, despite the deposit being under the wrong accounting head. The Tribunal held that this compliance fulfilled the requirements for penalty reduction, overturning the lower authority's decision to impose a 100% penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355480