<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 900 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal restored the appeal initially dismissed due to lack of clearance from the Committee on Disputes. The dispute revolved around the inclusion of certain charges in the assessable value for Central Excise Duty. Relying on previous rulings, including a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal favored the appellant, noting the removal of the Committee on Disputes approval requirement. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order set aside, and judgment granted in favor of the appellant on 05/12/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 900 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal restored the appeal initially dismissed due to lack of clearance from the Committee on Disputes. The dispute revolved around the inclusion of certain charges in the assessable value for Central Excise Duty. Relying on previous rulings, including a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal favored the appellant, noting the removal of the Committee on Disputes approval requirement. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order set aside, and judgment granted in favor of the appellant on 05/12/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>