https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198951 A complaint alleging cheating must contain specific facts showing fraudulent or dishonest intention at the inception of the transaction. On the facts, the dispute arose from non-payment of the balance due under a commercial arrangement after substantial payments had already been made, and the allegations did not show dishonest inducement when the parties entered into the transaction. Mere use of the words "cheating" or "deceive" was held insufficient without supporting averments. The Court treated the matter as a civil dispute arising from breach of contractual obligations, and the order issuing process was rightly set aside. en-us Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2024 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198951 A complaint alleging cheating must contain specific facts showing fraudulent or dishonest intention at the inception of the transaction. On the facts, the dispute arose from non-payment of the balance due under a commercial arrangement after substantial payments had already been made, and the allegations did not show dishonest inducement when the parties entered into the transaction. Mere use of the words "cheating" or "deceive" was held insufficient without supporting averments. The Court treated the matter as a civil dispute arising from breach of contractual obligations, and the order issuing process was rightly set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198951