https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198949 The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to establish his locus standi and prove any oppression or mismanagement. The Court emphasized procedural formalities, specific pleadings, and proof requirements. The requests for amending the application and impleading Murty as a co-appellant were also rejected. The Court highlighted the necessity of meeting shareholder criteria and proving allegations in cases of oppression and mismanagement. en-us Tue, 03 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:24:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198949 The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to establish his locus standi and prove any oppression or mismanagement. The Court emphasized procedural formalities, specific pleadings, and proof requirements. The requests for amending the application and impleading Murty as a co-appellant were also rejected. The Court highlighted the necessity of meeting shareholder criteria and proving allegations in cases of oppression and mismanagement. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 03 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198949