<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 884 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition as the petitioner was not deemed an operational creditor, there was no operational debt owed by the respondent, no privity of contract existed between the parties, the claim was not maintainable under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and a pre-existing dispute invalidated the petitioner&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 884 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition as the petitioner was not deemed an operational creditor, there was no operational debt owed by the respondent, no privity of contract existed between the parties, the claim was not maintainable under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and a pre-existing dispute invalidated the petitioner&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>