<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 880 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355459</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding tax demands and bank guarantees. The appellant&#039;s challenge on the Tribunal&#039;s imposition of additional conditions for interim protection was dismissed. The court found the directions given by the Single Judge were in line with previous court orders and aimed at ensuring compliance with tax demands. Emphasizing the discretionary nature of orders under Section 254(2A), the court concluded that no error was made in modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, along with pending interlocutory applications, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:49:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 880 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355459</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding tax demands and bank guarantees. The appellant&#039;s challenge on the Tribunal&#039;s imposition of additional conditions for interim protection was dismissed. The court found the directions given by the Single Judge were in line with previous court orders and aimed at ensuring compliance with tax demands. Emphasizing the discretionary nature of orders under Section 254(2A), the court concluded that no error was made in modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order. As a result, the appeals were dismissed, along with pending interlocutory applications, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>