<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 88 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11881</link>
    <description>Under the Unit Trust of India Act, 1963, income distributed to an initial contributor is treated as dividend, so the State Bank of India&#039;s receipt qualified for deduction under section 80M. Amounts credited to a bank suspense account were not taxable in the relevant assessment year under settled principles on income recognition, while amounts in the interest suspense account were taxable in that year under the principles governing interest income in banking matters. A subsidy paid by the bank to subsidiary branches was treated as revenue expenditure and allowed as a business deduction, following the court&#039;s earlier ruling on the same expenditure pattern. The references were answered substantially in favour of the assessee on all points.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 88 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11881</link>
      <description>Under the Unit Trust of India Act, 1963, income distributed to an initial contributor is treated as dividend, so the State Bank of India&#039;s receipt qualified for deduction under section 80M. Amounts credited to a bank suspense account were not taxable in the relevant assessment year under settled principles on income recognition, while amounts in the interest suspense account were taxable in that year under the principles governing interest income in banking matters. A subsidy paid by the bank to subsidiary branches was treated as revenue expenditure and allowed as a business deduction, following the court&#039;s earlier ruling on the same expenditure pattern. The references were answered substantially in favour of the assessee on all points.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>