<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 24 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11879</link>
    <description>The court held that the notices issued under Section 147 read with Section 148 of the Income-tax Act were without jurisdiction as the conditions for reopening assessments were not met. The court found that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue the notices and that the reasons provided did not fulfill the necessary conditions under the law. Therefore, the court allowed the petition, ruling in favor of the petitioner and quashing the notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 24 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11879</link>
      <description>The court held that the notices issued under Section 147 read with Section 148 of the Income-tax Act were without jurisdiction as the conditions for reopening assessments were not met. The court found that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue the notices and that the reasons provided did not fulfill the necessary conditions under the law. Therefore, the court allowed the petition, ruling in favor of the petitioner and quashing the notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>