<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 848 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original order in a case involving the classification of imported goods as &quot;Polyester Quilt Covers&quot; or &quot;Polyester Woven Fabrics.&quot; The appellant&#039;s objections regarding the adjudicating authority&#039;s jurisdiction on the pecuniary side were overruled due to failure to raise the issue timely. Discrepancies in classification arose from the nature and presentation of the goods, with industry declarations complicating the process. Despite reliance on expert reports and precedents, the Tribunal found the imported items did not meet the criteria to be classified as quilt covers, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 848 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original order in a case involving the classification of imported goods as &quot;Polyester Quilt Covers&quot; or &quot;Polyester Woven Fabrics.&quot; The appellant&#039;s objections regarding the adjudicating authority&#039;s jurisdiction on the pecuniary side were overruled due to failure to raise the issue timely. Discrepancies in classification arose from the nature and presentation of the goods, with industry declarations complicating the process. Despite reliance on expert reports and precedents, the Tribunal found the imported items did not meet the criteria to be classified as quilt covers, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>