https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198940 The Tribunal held that penalties imposed on the appellants were justified despite the main noticee settling the case with immunity. Each appellant had distinct roles in fraudulent activities, making them individually liable for penalties. The majority decision directed further examination of penalties based on the appellants' merits. The Tribunal resolved the differing opinions of members, upholding the appellants' liability for penalties. The case was listed for proceedings to determine penalties based on each appellant's involvement in the fraudulent activities. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:37:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198940 The Tribunal held that penalties imposed on the appellants were justified despite the main noticee settling the case with immunity. Each appellant had distinct roles in fraudulent activities, making them individually liable for penalties. The majority decision directed further examination of penalties based on the appellants' merits. The Tribunal resolved the differing opinions of members, upholding the appellants' liability for penalties. The case was listed for proceedings to determine penalties based on each appellant's involvement in the fraudulent activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198940