<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 836 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined the appellant&#039;s liability to pay service tax on 33% of the total contract value received during the impugned period, considering the exclusion of free supplies and entitlement to Notification benefits. The appellant was directed to pay the determined amount along with interest. No penalty was imposed under Section 78 of the Act. The appeal was disposed of based on these findings, providing a clear resolution to the issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 836 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined the appellant&#039;s liability to pay service tax on 33% of the total contract value received during the impugned period, considering the exclusion of free supplies and entitlement to Notification benefits. The appellant was directed to pay the determined amount along with interest. No penalty was imposed under Section 78 of the Act. The appeal was disposed of based on these findings, providing a clear resolution to the issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>