<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 829 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for service tax on professional fees received for services rendered abroad was not sustainable. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay and the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court, as well as the inapplicability of the extended period for invoking the demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 829 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for service tax on professional fees received for services rendered abroad was not sustainable. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay and the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court, as well as the inapplicability of the extended period for invoking the demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>