<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 823 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355402</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the transfer of the CL-9 licence to a partnership firm, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge based on the profit sharing ratio in the partnership deed. The Court ruled that any partnership disputes should be resolved in the Civil Court and found no illegality in the transfer process, as the partnership firm complied with all requirements. The writ petition was dismissed for lacking merit, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 823 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355402</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the transfer of the CL-9 licence to a partnership firm, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge based on the profit sharing ratio in the partnership deed. The Court ruled that any partnership disputes should be resolved in the Civil Court and found no illegality in the transfer process, as the partnership firm complied with all requirements. The writ petition was dismissed for lacking merit, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>