<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 820 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355399</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal against the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, finding no substantial question of law raised by the tribunal&#039;s remand decision. The case involved a dispute over duty demand, including central excise and customs duties, sought under specific notifications for a registered 100% Export Oriented Unit under the Software Technology Park Scheme. Despite the assessee&#039;s compliance with duty payment at depreciated value upon de-bonding, a show cause notice challenged this practice. The tribunal&#039;s order for remand was upheld, emphasizing adherence to prescribed procedures for duty liability determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 820 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355399</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal against the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, finding no substantial question of law raised by the tribunal&#039;s remand decision. The case involved a dispute over duty demand, including central excise and customs duties, sought under specific notifications for a registered 100% Export Oriented Unit under the Software Technology Park Scheme. Despite the assessee&#039;s compliance with duty payment at depreciated value upon de-bonding, a show cause notice challenged this practice. The tribunal&#039;s order for remand was upheld, emphasizing adherence to prescribed procedures for duty liability determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>