<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 817 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355396</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Noida challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The judgments of the Delhi High Court affirming similar orders in separate cases involving M/s. Chawla Packaging and Sheetal Mercantile Private Ltd. were considered final, leading to the affirmation of the CESTAT order. The High Court found no new grounds to interfere with the CESTAT order and concluded that the appeal lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 817 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355396</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Noida challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The judgments of the Delhi High Court affirming similar orders in separate cases involving M/s. Chawla Packaging and Sheetal Mercantile Private Ltd. were considered final, leading to the affirmation of the CESTAT order. The High Court found no new grounds to interfere with the CESTAT order and concluded that the appeal lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>