<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 815 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355394</link>
    <description>Electric wires and cables supplied for a specified mega power project were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. because they were supported by a certificate from the authorised project authority, and a technical objection to the issuing authority could not defeat substantive entitlement. The goods were also held classifiable under Heading 98.01 as items covered by the project-import framework for machinery, components and raw materials required for initial setting up of the project. On that basis, the exemption was sustained and the Tribunal&#039;s relief to the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:34:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 815 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355394</link>
      <description>Electric wires and cables supplied for a specified mega power project were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. because they were supported by a certificate from the authorised project authority, and a technical objection to the issuing authority could not defeat substantive entitlement. The goods were also held classifiable under Heading 98.01 as items covered by the project-import framework for machinery, components and raw materials required for initial setting up of the project. On that basis, the exemption was sustained and the Tribunal&#039;s relief to the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>