<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 33 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11874</link>
    <description>The court held that the ad hoc compensation of Rs. 8.50 lakhs received from the insurance company was taxable as income for the assessment year 1978-79. The court determined that the payment was made on account of the loss suffered by the assessee due to a fire incident and that the insurance company had acknowledged its liability by making the payment. The court concluded that the receipt was taxable as income and disposed of the reference in favor of the Department and against the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 33 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11874</link>
      <description>The court held that the ad hoc compensation of Rs. 8.50 lakhs received from the insurance company was taxable as income for the assessment year 1978-79. The court determined that the payment was made on account of the loss suffered by the assessee due to a fire incident and that the insurance company had acknowledged its liability by making the payment. The court concluded that the receipt was taxable as income and disposed of the reference in favor of the Department and against the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>