https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355389 The Tribunal upheld duty demand and penalties in a case involving alleged clandestine clearance of goods without duty payment through a fictitious firm. The Appellant's disputes were rejected due to admissions, lack of evidence, and confirmation of the fictitious firm's existence. The Director was held personally liable for penalties due to oversight and involvement in the illicit activities. The Tribunal confirmed penalties and confiscation, dismissing the Appeals and upholding the impugned order. en-us Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:33:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355389 The Tribunal upheld duty demand and penalties in a case involving alleged clandestine clearance of goods without duty payment through a fictitious firm. The Appellant's disputes were rejected due to admissions, lack of evidence, and confirmation of the fictitious firm's existence. The Director was held personally liable for penalties due to oversight and involvement in the illicit activities. The Tribunal confirmed penalties and confiscation, dismissing the Appeals and upholding the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355389