https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355371 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant against the Order-in-Original for excise duty and penalties on fabrication activities, stating that subcontracted fabrication work at customer sites did not constitute excisable production. Relying on precedents and emphasizing the absence of a workshop for fabrication, the Tribunal held that such activities did not attract excise duty, setting aside the impugned order. en-us Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:33:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355371 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant against the Order-in-Original for excise duty and penalties on fabrication activities, stating that subcontracted fabrication work at customer sites did not constitute excisable production. Relying on precedents and emphasizing the absence of a workshop for fabrication, the Tribunal held that such activities did not attract excise duty, setting aside the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355371