<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 786 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the right to reclaim disallowed Cenvat Credit or seek a refund. The appellant&#039;s eligibility for input credit on items used in fabrication was recognized, overturning the disallowance. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was deemed invalid. The decision was supported by precedents and the Miscellaneous Application for early hearing was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 786 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the right to reclaim disallowed Cenvat Credit or seek a refund. The appellant&#039;s eligibility for input credit on items used in fabrication was recognized, overturning the disallowance. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was deemed invalid. The decision was supported by precedents and the Miscellaneous Application for early hearing was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>