https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355364 The Tribunal set aside the decision to confiscate excess molasses and impose penalties on the appellant after finding no evidence of clandestine removal and considering industry guidelines on foaming in molasses tanks. Emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and industry-specific factors, the judgment highlights the need for fair treatment and consistency in applying legal precedents in cases involving excess goods. The appellant was granted relief based on the lack of proof of illegal activities and the influence of external factors on stock levels. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:32:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355364 The Tribunal set aside the decision to confiscate excess molasses and impose penalties on the appellant after finding no evidence of clandestine removal and considering industry guidelines on foaming in molasses tanks. Emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and industry-specific factors, the judgment highlights the need for fair treatment and consistency in applying legal precedents in cases involving excess goods. The appellant was granted relief based on the lack of proof of illegal activities and the influence of external factors on stock levels. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355364