<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 782 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of their refund claim for excess duty paid. The decision was based on evidence from the dealer, Volkswagen Group Sales India Private Limited, confirming that the excess excise duty was not passed on to customers. The Tribunal found that the duty paid by the appellant was not borne by the end-users, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal and granting them the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:32:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 782 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of their refund claim for excess duty paid. The decision was based on evidence from the dealer, Volkswagen Group Sales India Private Limited, confirming that the excess excise duty was not passed on to customers. The Tribunal found that the duty paid by the appellant was not borne by the end-users, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal and granting them the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>